Accessibility statement

La Fée Maraboutée is committed to making website (and its mobile applications and digital urban furniture) accessible in accordance with Article 47 of Law No. 2005-102 of 11 February 2005.

Compliance status

https://lafeemaraboutee.fr is partially compliant with the general framework for improving accessibility (RGAA).

Test results

The internal compliance audit reveals that: 54% of the criteria of RGAA version 4 are met.

Result details:

  • Number of compliant criteria: 40
  • Number of non-compliant criteria: 10
  • Number of non-applicable criteria: 32

Non-accessible content

The content listed below is not accessible for the following reasons.

Non-compliance

  • Every informative image lacks alternative text
  • Decorative images are not being properly ignored by assistive technologies
  • Each frame has no frame title
  • For each frame with a frame title, that frame title is not relevant
  • On each web page, the contrast between the text color and its background color is not high enough
  • In each web page, the colors used in interface components or informational graphic elements do not have sufficient contrast
  • Each pre-recorded synchronized timed media does not have synchronized captions when needed
  • Each pre-recorded time-based media does not have synchronized audio description when needed
  • Each temporal media is not clearly identifiable
  • Each non-temporal media has no alternative when necessary
  • Each temporal and non-temporal media is not compatible with assistive technologies
  • For each data table, no appropriate technique is used to associate each cell with its headers
  • Each link is not explicit
  • On every web page, each link has no label
  • On each web page, status messages are not properly conveyed by assistive technologies
  • For each web page, the generated source code is not valid according to the specified document type
  • In each web page, tags are used only for presentation purposes
  • On each web page, the information is not structured by the appropriate use of headings
  • On each web page, the information is no longer understandable when stylesheets are disabled
  • On each web page, the CSS declarations for element background color and font are not being used correctly
  • In every web page, each link whose nature is not obvious is not visible compared to the surrounding text
  • On each web page, the information is conveyed only by shape, size, or position
  • On each web page, the information conveyed by shape, size, or position is not implemented appropriately
  • For each web page, the content cannot be displayed without loss of information or functionality and requires scrolling in a restricted window
  • On each web page, text spacing properties cannot be redefined without loss of content or functionality
  • On each web page, additional content that appears on focus or hover of a component is not controllable by the user
  • On each web page, additional content via CSS styles only is not made visible with the keyboard or by pointing device
  • Each form field has no label
  • Each label associated with a form field is not relevant
  • In each form, the input control is not accompanied by suggestions to correct errors
  • The "site map" page is not relevant
  • In each set of pages, the "sitemap" page is not accessible in the same way
  • On each web page, no skip link or quick access to the main content area is present
  • In each web page, features requiring a complex gesture are not available with a simple gesture

Exceptions for disproportionate burden

No content to mention

Content not subject to the accessibility requirement

No content to mention

Detailed results by category

Images 3 / 5 compliant , 2 partials, 4 not applicable
Criterion 1.1 Does each informative image have alternative text?
Criterion 1.2 Is each decorative image correctly ignored by assistive technologies?
Criterion 1.3 For each informative image with alternative text, is that alternative text relevant (except in special cases)?
Criterion 1.4 For each image used as a CAPTCHA or as a test image, does the text alternative make it possible to identify the nature and function of the image?
Criterion 1.5 Is an alternative access solution to the content or function of the CAPTCHA present for each image used as a CAPTCHA?
Criterion 1.6 Does each informative image have, if necessary, a detailed description?
Criterion 1.7 For each informative image with a detailed description, is this description relevant?
Criterion 1.8 Does each informative image containing text, in the absence of a replacement mechanism, if possible get replaced by styled text? Is this rule followed, apart from special cases?
Criterion 1.9 Is each image caption, if necessary, correctly linked to the corresponding image?
Frames 0 / 2 compliant , 2 partials
Criterion 2.1 Does each frame have a frame title?
Criterion 2.2 For each frame with a frame title, is that frame title relevant?
Colors 1 / 3 compliant , 2 partials
Criterion 3.1 In every web page, information must not be conveyed by color alone. Is this rule respected?
Criterion 3.2 On each web page, is the contrast between the text color and its background color sufficiently high (except in special cases)?
Criterion 3.3 On each web page, are the colors used in interface components or informational graphic elements sufficiently contrasted, except in special cases?
Media 4 / 9 compliant , 4 partials, 1 non-compliant, 4 not applicable
Criterion 4.1 Does each prerecorded time-based media have, if necessary, a text transcript or an audio description (except in special cases)?
Criterion 4.2 For each pre-recorded temporal medium with a text transcript or synchronized audio description, are they relevant (except in special cases)?
Criterion 4.3 Does each pre-recorded synchronized temporal medium have synchronized subtitles, if necessary, except in special cases?
Criterion 4.4 For each pre-recorded synchronized time-based media with synchronized subtitles, are these subtitles relevant?
Criterion 4.5 Does each pre-recorded timed media have, if necessary, a synchronized audio description (except in special cases)?
Criterion 4.6 For each pre-recorded time-based media with synchronized audio description, is it relevant?
Criterion 4.7 Is each time-based media clearly identifiable (except in special cases)?
Criterion 4.8 Does each non-temporal media have, if needed, an alternative (except in special cases)?
Criterion 4.9 For each non-time-based media item that has an alternative, is that alternative relevant?
Criterion 4.10 Can each automatically triggered sound be controlled by the user?
Criterion 4.11 Is access to each time-based media, if necessary, controllable via the keyboard and any pointing device?
Criterion 4.12 Is each non-time-based media object accessible through the keyboard and any pointing device?
Criterion 4.13 Is each temporal and non-temporal media compatible with assistive technologies (except for special cases)?
Tables 1 / 2 compliant , 1 non-compliant, 6 not applicable
Criterion 5.1 Does each complex data table have a summary?
Criterion 5.2 For each complex data table with a summary, is it relevant?
Criterion 5.3 For each formatting table, does the linearized content remain understandable?
Criterion 5.4 For each data table with a title, is the title correctly associated with the data table?
Criterion 5.5 For each data table with a title, is it relevant?
Criterion 5.6 For each data table, are each column header and each row header correctly declared?
Criterion 5.7 For each data table, is the appropriate technique for associating each cell with its headers used (except in special cases)?
Criterion 5.8 Does each layout table avoid using data-table-specific elements? Is this rule being followed?
Links 0 / 2 compliant , 1 partials, 1 non-compliant
Criterion 6.1 Is each link explicit (except for special cases)?
Criterion 6.2 On each web page, is the generated source code valid according to the specified document type (except in special cases)?
Scripts 3 / 4 compliant , 1 non-compliant, 1 not applicable
Criterion 7.1 Is each script, if necessary, compatible with assistive technologies?
Criterion 7.2 For each script that has an alternative, is that alternative relevant?
Criterion 7.3 Is each script controllable by keyboard and by any pointing device (except in special cases)?
Criterion 7.4 For each script that initiates a context change, is the user notified or in control of it?
Criterion 7.5 On each web page, are status messages correctly conveyed by assistive technologies?
Code structure 5 / 7 compliant , 2 partials, 3 not applicable
Criterion 8.1 Is each web page defined by a document type?
Criterion 8.2 For each web page, is the language code for each language change valid and relevant?
Criterion 8.3 Is the default language present on each web page?
Criterion 8.4 For each web page with a default language, is the language code relevant?
Criterion 8.5 Does each web page have a page title?
Criterion 8.6 For each web page that has a page title, is that title relevant?
Criterion 8.7 In every web page, is each language change indicated in the source code (except in special cases)?
Criterion 8.8 Does every link on each web page have a label?
Criterion 8.9 In each web page, tags must not be used solely for presentation purposes. Is this rule followed?
Criterion 8.10 Are changes in reading direction indicated on each web page?
Information structuring 2 / 3 compliant , 1 partials, 1 not applicable
Criterion 9.1 In each web page, is the information structured by the appropriate use of headings?
Criterion 9.2 Is the document structure consistent on each web page (except for special cases)?
Criterion 9.3 Is each list on every web page properly structured?
Criterion 9.4 In each web page, is each quotation correctly indicated?
Information presentation 4 / 13 compliant , 6 partials, 3 non-compliant, 1 not applicable
Criterion 10.1 Are style sheets used on the website to control the presentation of the information?
Criterion 10.2 On each web page, does the visible content carrying information remain present when style sheets are disabled?
Criterion 10.3 On each web page, is the information still understandable when style sheets are disabled?
Criterion 10.4 On each web page, does the text remain readable when the font size is increased to at least 200% (except in special cases)?
Criterion 10.5 On each web page, are the CSS declarations for element background colors and font used correctly?
Criterion 10.6 On each web page, is every link whose purpose is not obvious visually distinguishable from the surrounding text?
Criterion 10.7 On each web page, for every element receiving focus, is the focus visible?
Criterion 10.8 For each web page, are hidden contents intended to be ignored by assistive technologies?
Criterion 10.9 On each web page, information must not be conveyed by shape, size, or position alone. Is this rule respected?
Criterion 10.10 On each web page, information should not be conveyed by form, size, or position alone. Is this rule implemented appropriately?
Criterion 10.11 For each web page, can the content be presented without loss of information or functionality and without requiring vertical scrolling for a window having a height of...
Criterion 10.12 On each web page, can the text spacing properties be redefined by the user without loss of content or functionality (except in special cases)?
Criterion 10.13 On each web page, are additional content that appears when an interface component receives focus or is hovered over controllable by the user, except in special cases?
Criterion 10.14 On each web page, can additional content that appears only through CSS styles be made visible via the keyboard and by any pointing device?
Forms 7 / 10 compliant , 3 partials, 3 not applicable
Criterion 11.1 Does each form field have a label?
Criterion 11.2 Is each label associated with a form field relevant (except in special cases)?
Criterion 11.3 In each form, is every label associated with a form field that has the same function and is repeated several times on the same page or across a set of pages consistent?
Criterion 11.4 In each form, are each field label and its associated field adjacent to each other (except in special cases)?
Criterion 11.5 In each form, are fields of the same type grouped together, if necessary?
Criterion 11.6 In each form, does each grouping of fields of the same type have a legend?
Criterion 11.7 In each form, is each legend associated with a grouping of fields of the same type relevant?
Criterion 11.8 In each form, are the items of the same type in a choice list grouped in a relevant way?
Criterion 11.9 In each form, is the label on each button relevant (except in special cases)?
Criterion 11.10 In each form, is the input control used appropriately (except in special cases)?
Criterion 11.11 In each form, is the input control accompanied, if necessary, by suggestions that make it easier to correct input errors?
Criterion 11.12 For each form that modifies or deletes data, or that submits answers to a test or exam, or whose validation has financial or legal consequences, the data sa...
Criterion 11.13 Can the purpose of an input field be inferred to make it easier to automatically fill fields with the user’s data?
Navigation 5 / 8 compliant , 1 partials, 2 non-compliant, 3 not applicable
Criterion 12.1 Does each set of pages have at least two different navigation systems (except in special cases)?
Criterion 12.2 In each set of pages, are the menu and navigation bars always in the same place (except in special cases)?
Criterion 12.3 Is the "site map" page relevant?
Criterion 12.4 In each set of pages, is the “site map” page reachable in the same way?
Criterion 12.5 In each set of pages, is the search engine reachable in the same way?
Criterion 12.6 The content grouping areas present in several web pages (header areas, main navigation, main content, footer, and search engine) can they be...
Criterion 12.7 On each web page, is a skip link or a quick access link to the main content area present (except in special cases)?
Criterion 12.8 Is the tab order consistent on each web page?
Criteria 12.9 In every web page, navigation must not contain any keyboard trap. Is this rule respected?
Criterion 12.10 On each web page, are keyboard shortcuts that use only a single key (lowercase or uppercase letter, punctuation, number, or symbol) user-controllable?
Criterion 12.11 On each web page, are additional contents that appear on hover, focus, or activation of an interface component reachable by keyboard if necessary?
Viewing 5 / 6 compliant , 1 non-compliant, 6 not applicable
Criterion 13.1 Does the user have control over every time limit that changes content on each web page (except special cases)?
Criterion 13.2 In each web page, opening a new window must not be triggered without user action. Is this rule respected?
Criterion 13.3 Does every web page and every downloadable office document have, where necessary, an accessible version (except in special cases)?
Criterion 13.4 For each office document with an accessible version, does this version provide the same information?
Criterion 13.5 In each web page, does every cryptic content (ASCII art, emoticon, cryptic syntax) have an alternative?
Criterion 13.6 In each web page, for each cryptic content (ASCII art, emoticon, cryptic syntax) that has an alternative, is that alternative relevant?
Criterion 13.7 On each web page, are sudden changes in brightness or flash effects used correctly?
Criterion 13.8 On each web page, is every moving or flashing content controllable by the user?
Criterion 13.9 Is the content offered on each web page accessible regardless of screen orientation (portrait or landscape) (except in special cases)?
Criterion 13.10 In each web page, can the functionalities usable or available through a complex gesture also be available through a simple gesture (except in special cases)?
Criterion 13.11 On each web page, can actions triggered by a pointing device at a single point on the screen be canceled (except in special cases)?
Criterion 13.12 On each web page, can features that involve movement of the device or toward the device be satisfied in an alternative way (except in special cases)?

Establishment of this accessibility statement

This statement was established on 05 January 2026. It was updated on 05 January 2026.

Technologies used to build the site

  • Shopify Liquid
  • HTML5
  • CSS
  • JavaScript

Test environment

Operating systems

  • Apple Mac OS X 13.4
  • Microsoft Windows 11
  • Apple iOS 16
  • Google Android 13

Browsers and software

In the latest versions available on the different operating systems:

  • Google Chrome
  • Windows Edge
  • Safari
  • Brave
  • Adobe Acrobat Reader / Preview on Mac (for PDFs only)

Tools used during the evaluation

  • Mouse emulators, screen magnifiers and on-screen keyboards for different systems.
  • Voiceover (Apple systems only)
  • Talkback (Android only)
  • NVDA 2024 and Freedom scientific Jaws 2022 (PC systems only)
  • Tanaguru webext RGAA4
  • RGAA Assistant
  • Graphic evaluation tools available on different systems (colors, contrast, subtitles, etc.)

Feedback and contact

If you are unable to access content or a service, you can contact the person responsible for La Fée Maraboutée to be directed to an accessible alternative or to obtain the content in another format.

Remedies

If you notice an accessibility issue that prevents you from accessing content or a feature on the site, and you report it to us but do not receive a response from us, you are entitled to send your complaints or a request for referral to the Defender of Rights.

Several options are available to you: